Main Menu

What are you working on?

Started by MechaGS, September 17, 2013, 11:19:42 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

epicallyfun

I am working on my new forum and website! :)

MechaGS

#16
Quote from: epicallyfunI am working on my new forum and website! :)

It's nice to see another web developer around these parts. :D

TheRaven

I wish you the best of luck with your site and forum epicallyfun. :)

mousey

I wouldn't say that I am actually working on it yet, but I've been wondering if the binary that we are using is really the simplest/best way.  This might sound absurd...well I've been told that it is, and that I need to get my head checked. So what I am working on is trying to break the old binary system and find a better one.

mightyno67277p

#19
Quote from: mouseyI wouldn't say that I am actually working on it yet, but I've been wondering if the binary that we are using is really the simplest/best way.  This might sound absurd...well I've been told that it is, and that I need to get my head checked. So what I am working on is trying to break the old binary system and find a better one.

You mean a trinary system? I have day dream that, but when dealing with pulses of electric waves, all that I can think of possible is Binary. Now, Quantum Computing is doing something different:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_computer

http://www.howstuffworks.com/quantum-computer.htm


http://physics.about.com/od/quantumphysics/f/quantumcomp.htm



http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qt-quantcomp/



http://www.efytimes.com/e1/fullnews.asp?edid=125197&ModPagespeed



Although, I do not see these machines coming into the market any time soon, or in general computing FTM.

But Life has proven me wrong many times. It may just happen.

mousey

I've read up on a couple of those, I'm really curious how D-Wave's Quantum annealing will work out in the long run. it seems like it would work pretty good, but i have a feeling that that process would work better using a new system over the old binary. Just seems like it would run into an issue with being restricted.  I actually meant in terms of the usage of the 8 bit. But if we were to follow a similar double helix structure like our DNA using 4 values, i'm pretty sure it would work out better. I just haven't been able to fully figure out how it would be done yet.

TheRaven

I just recently started a new Teen Titans fan fiction based around my newest OC Axle. (xD Can you guess who he's somewhat based off of?) See I already have 2 other Teen Titans ocs but I decided to make another one recently. He needed a back story so I decided just to write up a short but sweet fan fic. :)

dragonborn99

I just begun with working on a massive roleplay universe project for my forum. :)

TheRaven

Been working on teaching myself MIPS assembly, since I want to start hacking Legend of Legaia my favorite RPG on the Playstation. I've already hacked some text in the game, but I want to actually edit things other than text and edit the spells, and anything else I can without severely messing up my iso. :V

Jagos

I just got done with my economic outlook on Capcom:







So now I plan to get back on the MN9 bandwagon.

TheRaven

I've started to teach myself Java, I already know C# a bit so I'm picking it up pretty quickly. xD

TheCloudyEye

I'm struggling with Java right now. It's kinda nice that Java has so many libraries for you to use, but it can get really confusing at times.

icannotdomyjob

@TheRaven

So you are not manipulating the ISO that's running around instead? I am one to encourage others to learn assembly of any architecture, but are you complicating yourself?





@Jagos

Nice. I've used your videos during a couple debates at times.

[spoilerbox]
Spoiler
I am a secret follower of your work, I just don't use youtube's "subscribe"
[/spoilerbox]



@TheRaven @TheCloudyEye

If it's not a requisite to learn, I'd suggest a Lisp variant, like SBCL, Racket, Scheme, etc..



ANSI C if you want to get to the gritty mechanics of both assembly and structured imperative (procedural) programming. Even if Clean and OCaml are outperforming regular C.